Re: DVR, help!

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jeff Brickley (jbrickley++at++lmwsmr.lesc.lockheed.com)
Wed, 09 Apr 1997 09:01:27 -0700


 ----------
From: RÚmi Arnaud
To: Jan Barglowski
Cc: info-performer
Subject: Re: DVR, help!
Date: Wednesday, April 09, 1997 12:29AM

Jan Barglowski wrote:
>>
>> Hello Performers!
>>
>> I'm trying to simulate a view that is degraded on the outside but
>> sharper on the inside. For example:
>> ------------------------------
>> | |
>> | low-res |
>> | |
>> | ---------- |
>> | | high | |
>> | | -res | |
>> | | | |
>> | ---------- |
>> | |
>> | |
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> I'm trying to do this with DVR on the low-res channel, and then
overlaying
>> another channel in the middle. The code I'm using is below:
>>
>
> To do what you want, you need 2 separate projectors, using 2 different
> video output on the IR at different resolutions. This is often refered
> as Area of Interest in the Vis Sim vocabulary.

Would this save any work from the Raster Managers: render 2 landscape
models, one on each size of a clipping plane so that you cannot see the
other. One Model has a texture of only 256x256, the other maximum texture
resolution or clip-mapped, then render the smaller texture scene full
screen, render a portion of the other (high-res), from the same point of
view (offset to the other landscape) in a small window?

It's kind-of bulky on the polygon count, but would that type of rendering
save any work from the raster-managers? I'm lucky, I haven't had to worry
about overworking RMs, but this question started me thinking about it....

Jeffry Brickley
Lockheed Martin
White Sands Missile Range

===================================List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:01 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.