Re: valid numbers

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Nicolas Gauvin (nicolas++at++cae.ca)
Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:19:47 -0500

On Mar 27, 8:11am, Bryan Wasileski wrote:
> Subject: valid numbers
> Performers:
>
> that it IS a valid floating point number before using it. Are there any
> routines already available that check for valid floating point
> representation?
>-- End of excerpt from Bryan Wasileski

Yes, you can find them in 'man isnan'

-- 
Nicolas Gauvin			CAE Electronics Ltd., 8585 Cote De Liesse
Software Developer 		Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada, H4L-4X4
3-D Graphics Applications	tel: +1 514 341 2000 extension 2275
nicolas++at++cae.ca			fax: +1 514 340 5496
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:58 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.