Re: Texture types question

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Rob Jenkins (robj++at++quid)
Wed, 19 Feb 1997 16:18:07 -0800


If you do imginfo on one file of each format you'll see the differences:

They both have File format: SGI but:

.int has one channel and luminance color model so you use for intensity only
textures ( less texture memory ) to maybe be blended with a color

.rgb has 3 channels and color model RGB so you use for textures with color
information in

imgcopy will let you change between formats.

Cheers
Rob

On Feb 19, 9:23am, Russell Suter wrote:
> Subject: Texture types question
> Hey,
>
> This may be a dumb question but...
>
> What's the difference between .rgb and .int texture files? Is one better
> than the other for some reason?
>
>
> --
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
______________________________
> Though my eyes could see | Russell Suter
> I still was a blind man. | Voice : (303) 889-1262
> Though my mind could think | Fax : (303) 889-1210
> I still was a mad man. | Internet :
russell++at++ctasim.com
> _______________________________________________|______________________________
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from Russell Suter

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Rob Jenkins mailto:robj++at++csd.sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Mtn View, California, USA
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:40 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.