Re: Blending between levels of detail for texture

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Ran Yakir (rany++at++rtset.co.il)
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 19:00:43 +0000


On Feb 12, 9:40am, WILLIAM_MARINELLI++at++ntsc.navy.mil wrote:
> Subject: Blending between levels of detail for texture
>
> I generated a little demo that does a hokey texture level of detail
> using a couple of polygons with vastly different texture patterns. The
> level of detail switching distances did not overlap - one would switch
> out at 200m and the othere would switch in at that same distance.
>
> MultiGen Marcus, my understanding is that to do this you have to use a
> separate polygon for each texture. Is that correct?
>
> I ran it in perfly and the blending was excellent - no popping
> whatsoever.
>
> Angus et al, any idea how perfly does this? I tried grepping for this
> and that in the perfly source code directory and (uh, duh) found
> nothing.

1. With pfChanLODAttr() you can set a global fade range between any two
succesive LODs, or -

2. With pfLODTransition() you can set individual fade range for two indices in
a LOD.

Ran

-- 
 __                                  | Ran Yakir
 /_)  _  __   \  / _   / o __        | RT-SET Ltd.
/ )_ (_(_) )   \/ (_(_/<_(_)(        | 
              _/                     |   
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Phone :                              | E-mail : rany++at++rtset.co.il
  Work : 972-9-9552236               |          rany++at++netvision.net.il
  Res. : 972-9-7489974               |
Fax    : 972-9-9552239               |
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:39 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.