pfPipeWindow constructor

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Christopher R Volpe (volpe++at++ash.crd.ge.com)
Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:42:20 -0500


Documentation question:
        Is there some reason why the C++ reference page for pfPipeWindows
indicates that the constructor takes no arguments? The documentation
just sent me on a wild goose chase looking for *some* C++ method for
associating a pfPipe with a pfPipeWindow, since it allegedly isn't done
at creation side on the C++ side, the way it is in C. Of course,
subsequent inspection (which I should have done sooner :( ) of the
header file revealed that the documentation is wrong, and that the pipe
is passed into the constructor. Is this a known and subsequently fixed
problem, or should I forward this correction off to techpubs++at++sgi.com? If
it's known and fixed, is there available somewhere an errata sheet for
the C++ reference pages?

thanks,
Chris

--

Chris Volpe Phone: (518) 387-7766 GE Corporate R&D Fax: (518) 387-6560 PO Box 8 Email: volpecr++at++crd.ge.com Schenectady, NY 12301 Web: http://www.crd.ge.com/~volpecr ======================================================================= List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/ Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:31 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.