Re: AN interesting comment.

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

ken sartor (sartor++at++bur.visidyne.com)
Mon, 20 Jan 1997 12:37:08 -0600

Next message: Scott McMillan: "Re: 2.1 vs 2.0 for Max Impacts"
Previous message: Angus Dorbie: "Re: Shadow and projected texture"
In reply to: pere1++at++cluny.ensam.fr: "Shadow and projected texture"

At 04:55 PM 1/17/97 +0100, Andreas Simon wrote:
>Steve Baker wrote:
>
>> > There is another effect of double framing however. A motion that is
>> > double framed seems to move faster than one that is single framed,
>

Is this 'feature' being discussed not exactly the same as using a
30 Hz screen refresh rate screen that is single framed?

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

Next message: Scott McMillan: "Re: 2.1 vs 2.0 for Max Impacts"
Previous message: Angus Dorbie: "Re: Shadow and projected texture"
In reply to: pere1++at++cluny.ensam.fr: "Shadow and projected texture"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:23 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.