Re: AN interesting comment.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Mike Weiblen (mew++at++paradigmsim.com)
Fri, 17 Jan 1997 11:44:00 -0600

I've come to realize that using only two question marks was
insufficient to indicate the incredulity I attempted to infer
in my original comment. :-)

I would like to better understand exactly what Blinn is
describing. Is the term "conventional animators"
(perhaps meaning hand-drawn cel animation) significant
to the context of his comment?

Steve, could you post the URL to the original document?

Cheers
-- mew

Angus Dorbie wrote:
> This is a strange statement, motion blur is primarily used to
> avoid temporal aliasing.
>
> Cheers,
> Angus.
>
> On Jan 16, 4:51pm, Mike Weiblen wrote:
> > The double framing would seem to invite temporal aliasing,
> > which is perhaps perceived as a motion blur??

-- 
Mike Weiblen                  talkto:972-960-2301 x292
PARADIGM Simulation, Inc.     faxto:972-960-2303
14900 Landmark, Suite 400     mailto:mew++at++paradigmsim.com
Dallas TX 75240               http://www.paradigmsim.com
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:22 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.