Re: AN interesting comment.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++bitch.reading.sgi.com)
Fri, 17 Jan 1997 09:09:48 +0000

On Jan 16, 4:51pm, Mike Weiblen wrote:
> Subject: Re: AN interesting comment.
> The double framing would seem to invite temporal aliasing,
> which is perhaps perceived as a motion blur??
>

Sorry for replying again but it's important to remember that the original
statement didn't suggest this double framing was desirable in any way other
than to make things appear livelier for some unexplained psychological
reason.

Cheers,
Angus.
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:21 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.