Re: AN interesting comment.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++bitch.reading.sgi.com)
Fri, 17 Jan 1997 09:05:42 +0000

This is a strange statement, motion blur is primarily used to
avoid temporal aliasing.

Cheers,
Angus.

On Jan 16, 4:51pm, Mike Weiblen wrote:
> Subject: Re: AN interesting comment.
> The double framing would seem to invite temporal aliasing,
> which is perhaps perceived as a motion blur??
>
> -- mew

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:21 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.