Re: 2.1 vs 2.0 for Max Impacts

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Shirley Pratt (pratts++at++gdi4.gdi.net)
Tue, 14 Jan 97 23:30:21 EST

>From: "Howard Larson" <larson++at++howard.es.hac.com>
>Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 19:28:41 -0800
>To: pratts++at++gdi4.gdi.net (Shirley Pratt)
>Subject: Re: 2.1 vs 2.0 for Max Impacts
>
> What does "recently got" mean... IRIX 6.4 with R10000 cpus ?
                                               ^^^
                                               ???

This bunch we got are all Indigo 2 Max Impacts with R10000 CPU, IRIX 6.2

>
>Performer 2.0 came out Dec 95,
>
>you should use Performer 2.1
> if you do NOT have a R4400 in your Indigo 2 Max Impacts

OK, BUT a couple other ones we already have are Indigo 2 Max Impacts
with R4400 CPUs. We'll need to install what works on all
our Max Impacts to remain sane so I'll recommend upgrades to R10000 for
those ;)

        Thanks for your input, Shirley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*********************** Note new job info *************************

Shirley Pratt TRADOC Analysis Center - WSMR
Operations Research Analyst ATTN: ATRC-WAA
Soldier Station Simulation & Analysis White Sands Missile Range
                                       New Mexico 88002-5502
Stationed in Orlando, FL until 1/98 :D
Email: pratts++at++gdi.net or pratts++at++dis.trac.wsmr.army.mil
Phone: (407) 673-3610 FAX: (407) 679-3220*
* Pls notify me by e-mail if you send me a FAX.
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:20 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.