Re: again: subclassing pfNode

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Daniel Jia (rock.csd.sgi.com!sgi.com!uunet.uu.net!ds9!cagiva!xilin)
Mon, 9 Dec 1996 15:55:00 -0500

On Dec 9, 10:29am, Bernard Leclerc wrote:
> Subject: Re: again: subclassing pfNode
>
> ... ...
>
> If you really need to derive from pfNode, you'll need support from the
> Performer Team because this abstract base class is not documented
> sufficiently to allow you to derive a new class from it.
>
>
>-- End of excerpt from Bernard Leclerc

Good point! Shouldn't that be well documented?

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:07 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.