Re: incorect texture for indigo2 impact under IRIS 5.3

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Rob Jenkins (robj++at++quid)
Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:27:27 -0800


On Dec 5, 3:46pm, chien wrote:
> Subject: incorect texture for indigo2 impact under IRIS 5.3
> To:"Rob"
> Cc:"performer"
>
> Thanks for Rob's help!I have a problem about texture apperance were quit
coarse
> in indigo2 impact under IRIS5.3 and 6.2.Did there any patch for this or what
I
> should do for texture.
>
> Thanks
>-- End of excerpt from chien

If your Impact only has 1 Meg of TRAM ( texture memory ) then it only supports
16 bit textures so with RGBA you only get 4 bits/component which can cause
banding, run /usr/gfx/gfxinfo on that machine to check the amount of TRAM you
have. You could get 8 bits/component for 2 component textures or it is possible
to disable the use of HW texturing on a 1 TRAM machine, SW texturing won't have
the resolution restriction but **would be slow**:

setenv USE_SOFT_TEXTURE 1

will disable HW texturing - only on 1 TRAM machines though. Obviously just use
unsetenv or set it back to 0 to re-enable. This isn't global, in other words if
you set this in a shell it only effects programs run in that shell afterwards
-if you run the same code in another shell ( without the variable set ) it'll
use HW texturing.

If lack of TRAM is the problem then upgrading to 4 Meg TRAM is the best option,
if you do have 4 M TRAM then let me know....

Cheers
Rob

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Rob Jenkins mailto:robj++at++csd.sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Mtn View, California, USA
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:05 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.