Steve Baker (steve++at++mred.bgm.link.com)
Mon, 2 Dec 96 08:18:42 -0500
: WE ARE USING PERFORMER1.2 NOT PERFORMER2.0 in the last mail
: ^^^ ^^^
..<snip>...
: ld:
: Unresolved:
: pfNewGset
: pfRemoveGset
: pfGetNumGsets
: pfAddGset
: pfGetGset
This is weird - but if there is any confusion over whether this is
truly a Perf 1.2 or a Perf 2.0 issue, then one guess might be that
we are somehow compiling parts of the system in C++ and other parts
in C, then all the other (C++) Performer functions would link OK,
but the newly inserted (C) functions would not.
One weird thing is that the link line says...
cc -xansi -D__STDC__ .... -lC
^^ ^^^
C C++
This is only a stray thought - I could be way off track.
Steve Baker 817-619-1361 (Vox-Lab)
Hughes Training Inc. 817-619-8776 (Vox-Office/Vox-Mail)
2200 Arlington Downs Road 817-619-4028 (Fax)
Arlington, Texas. TX 76005-6171 Steve++at++MrEd.bgm.link.com (eMail)
http://www.hti.com (external) http://MrEd.bgm.link.com/staff/steve (intranet)
http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1 (external)
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:54:04 PDT