Re: DVR still not correct?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Rob Jenkins (robj++at++quid)
Fri, 15 Nov 1996 07:53:06 -0800

On Sep 15, 12:16pm, Jean-Claude Bachmann wrote:
> Subject: Re: DVR still not correct?
> Tinker, Peter wrote:
> >
> > I'm running Performer 2.2 on a 3-pipe iR, IRIX 6.x, OpenGL. Two pipes have
>
> Is this a small mistake concerning version numbering or is there really
> a Performer version 2.2 available. If so where do I get it and
> where do I get information regarding new functionality bug fixes, etc.
>
> I only know of Performer 2.1 !
>

Performer 2.1 is the latest released version. I think Peter is Beta testing
Performer 2.2. On that problem, Peter I tested 2 channel DVR using perfly and
it worked fine. That was with Performer 2.2 Beta a50, do you know which Beta
versions you have ? If your not sure it's the latest then speak to your Beta
test contact and try the latest ( seems to be a58 at the moment ).

Cheers
Rob

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Rob Jenkins mailto:robj++at++csd.sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Mtn View, California, USA
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:57 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.