Daniel Dougherty (Daniel.Dougherty++at++trw.com)
13 Nov 1996 12:21:51 -0800
Hello all,
I have some questions in regards to Performer 2.0(Beta version)/Performer 2.0 and changing from a 5.3 environment to a 6.2. Are there significant differences between Performer 2.0(Beta) and 2.0? How does IrisGL and OpenGL play a role. Performer can deal with both IGL and OGL, right? Original development was done in the Performer 2.0(Beta)/ 5.3 environment.
I have run into a lot of problems trying to understand the similiarities and differences between porting from 5.3 to 6.2. We have changed to a couple of platforms with 6.2(Onyx, Crimson, Max Impact) and it seems we need to carry over the 5.3 "baggage" in order for it to work, I guess that is because we incorporate function calls in our "stealth" application for 5.3. Would we need to change our application function calls to adhere to 6.2 in order to get out of constantly bringing the 5.3 libraries?
On the Max Impact(6.2)
I got these:
ld: WARNING 84: /usr/lib/libInventor.so not used for resolving an symbol.
ld: WARNING 85: definition of _checktraps in /usr/lib/libfpe.so preempts
that definition in /usr/lib/libc.so
ls: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "pfPushState" 1st referenced by label.0
The Makefile consists of a list of
Ex.
OBJS: label.o \
tracker.o \ ...
it dies in each file on performer calls
Ex.
label.c
pfPushState();
Information on my questions would be greatly appreciated and any help
thanx in advance
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:56 PDT