Re: Dynamic Video Resolution on Performer 2.1

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Haruo NOMA (noma++at++mic.atr.co.jp)
Tue, 5 Nov 1996 09:13:02 +0900


At 8:54 PM on 96.10.29, Clive Harding wrote:

> There seems to be a problem with DVR on the IR in performer 2.1.
>
> This can be simply demonstrated using perfly. Set up your IR to do
> 2++at++1280x1024_60. Log in etc. Run perfly -c 2 -V 1 afile.flt . The left
> channel (channel 0) output is scaled (by using the up and down arrow
> keys) but the right channel (channel 1) has its image scaled down but
> does not then resize properly. You can turn the stats on to show the
> effect if you haven't got a database loaded.
>
> I tried modifying the vchan.c demo in /usr/share/Performer......
> to output two channels or even select channel 1 for DVR to happen on.
> It seemed to want to perform DVR on channel 0 no matter what I did.
>
> It's OK if you want one channel to be DVR'd.
>
> Does anyone know anything about this ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Clive.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Clive Harding, Software Support Group, Silicon Graphics UK Ltd.
> Forum 1, Station Road, Theale, Reading, UK, RG7 4RA.
>
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

----------------
Haruo Noma
ATR Media Integration and Communications Research Lab.
Tel: +81-774-95-1401 Fax: +81-774-95-1408
e-mail: noma++at++mic.atr.co.jp

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:53 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.