Re: Latency critical viewing transformation updates?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Steve Baker (steve++at++mred.bgm.link.com)
Thu, 24 Oct 96 15:02:18 -0500


Javier said:

> Some people even included accelerometer sensors in addition to the tracker,
> building a much faster predictive digital filter.
>
> You may find interesting a siggraph paper from Hughes, in wich they descrive
> this kind of set up.
>
> There is a very high end helment buit by Hughes that reduce the user latency
> (we should say that reduce the error), looking like a "latency free" tracking.

I don't work for the part of Hughes that makes the helmet - but I have played
with it. I understand that there is a demo planned for I/ITSEC this year - and
it uses a Performer application on iR hardware - so what you'll be seeing is
"real".

It does indeed have accellerometers that feed the Performer code to allow a
little predictive stuff. I recollect that it also does some video raster
shifting to take out some of the high yaw rate effects.

I don't think the SigGraph paper is talking about the same helmet as the one
that we sell - but there are several on offer so I could easily be wrong.

If you are interested, check out:

    http://www.hti.com/clearvue.html

    also

    http://www.hti.com/avs.html

Steve Baker 817-619-1361 (Vox-Lab)
Hughes Training Inc. 817-619-8776 (Vox-Office/Vox-Mail)
2200 Arlington Downs Road 817-619-4028 (Fax)
Arlington, Texas. TX 76005-6171 Steve++at++MrEd.bgm.link.com (eMail)
http://www.hti.com (external) http://MrEd.bgm.link.com/staff/steve (intranet)

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:48 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.