Re: path following question

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jean-Luc Dery (dery++at++atlantis.discreet.qc.ca)
Mon, 7 Oct 1996 21:14:23 -0400

On Oct 7, 4:53pm, dchapman++at++pecos.ncsa.uiuc.edu.ncsa.uiuc.edu wrote:
> Subject: path following question
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use the path following support that is available in
> libpfutil that allows paths of varying speeds to be built. It would
> be very helpful if someone could send me an example, or direct
> me to an example of how to use these functions. I have not been
> able to find examples in the Performer examples that SGI provides.
>
> Thanks!
> Dee
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from dchapman++at++pecos.ncsa.uiuc.edu.ncsa.uiuc.edu

I know of an example provided with Performer in

/usr/share/Performer/src/lib/libpfutil/path.c

Have you seen that one ???

If not, I'm sure it can help.

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________________


Jean-Luc Dery                         Discreet Logic
System Engineer                       5505 boul. St-Laurent, bureau 5200
3-D Graphics Technology               Montreal (Quebec), Canada, H2T 1S6
                                      Tel: (514) 272-0525 #394
Email: dery++at++discreet.com              Fax: (514) 272-0585
_____________________________________________________________________________


=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:43 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.