IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?

Duvideo (duvideoii++at++mail.telepac.pt)
Sat, 21 Sep 1996 17:23:52 +0100

• Next message: Don Hatch: "Re: Missing .iv load with n32/64 libs"
• Previous message: Frank Purschke: "Re: Missing .iv load with n32/64 libs"
• Next in thread: Bela_A_Kekesi_at_2-HACHQ3++at++CCGATE.HAC.COM: "Re: IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?"
• Maybe reply: Bela_A_Kekesi_at_2-HACHQ3++at++CCGATE.HAC.COM: "Re: IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?"
• Maybe reply: Remi Arnaud: "Re: IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?"

I'm now using IRIS GL because I thought it was faster and better than OPEN
GL. Am I correct?

thanks
        Nuno Godinho

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

• Next message: Don Hatch: "Re: Missing .iv load with n32/64 libs"
• Previous message: Frank Purschke: "Re: Missing .iv load with n32/64 libs"
• Next in thread: Bela_A_Kekesi_at_2-HACHQ3++at++CCGATE.HAC.COM: "Re: IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?"
• Maybe reply: Bela_A_Kekesi_at_2-HACHQ3++at++CCGATE.HAC.COM: "Re: IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?"
• Maybe reply: Remi Arnaud: "Re: IRIS GL or OPEN GL? Which one should I use?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:36 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.