Re: DVR on iR

Sharon Clay (src++at++rose.asd.sgi.com)
Mon, 9 Sep 1996 10:55:15 -0700

• Next message: Erik Brisson: "Performer and GLUT"
• Previous message: Brian Furtaw: "pfCycleBuffer's causing SEGV's"

If the values are not changing then they do not need to be made.

src.

-- 
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++
Sharon Rose Clay (Fischler) - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
src++at++sgi.com  (415) 933 - 1002  FAX: (415) 965 - 2658  MS 8U-590
http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++


attached mail follows:
From: "Lionel Maiaux" 


Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 15:33:24 -0600


To: info-performer++at++sgi.com


Subject: DVR on iR


Is there any reason to repeat these calls EVERY frames in DVR_AUTO mode between
pfSync and pfFrame (see perfly.c) ?

pfPVChanDVRMode
pfPVChanStressFilter
pfuCursorType
pfChanProjMode

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------                        Lionel Maiaux
                       l.maiaux++at++corys.fr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com




=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com






Next message: Erik Brisson: "Performer and GLUT"
Previous message: Brian Furtaw: "pfCycleBuffer's causing SEGV's"






New Message
Reply
Date view
Thread view
Subject view
Author view







This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 
on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:31 PDT




This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection.  Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.