Re: trouble with perfly -x under 6.2 on Indigo 2 Extreme

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Daniela Rainer (rus3d++at++visin1.rus.uni-stuttgart.de)
Thu, 29 Aug 1996 10:14:58 +0000


On Aug 28, 8:49pm, Sharon Clay wrote:
> Subject: Re: trouble with perfly -x under 6.2 on Indigo 2 Extreme
>
> +>---- On Aug 28, 5:57pm, Jon Christensen wrote:
> > Subject: trouble with perfly -x under 6.2 on Indigo 2 Extreme
> ->After upgrading one of our Indigo 2's to 6.2 and upgrading
> ->Performer dev and eoe to 2.0.2 (patches 1392 and 1347), perfly -x
> ->is now crashing with some type of gl error. Our main application
> ->which runs fine under 2.0, dies after calling pfuGLXWinopen. We're
> ->trying to get to 2.0.2 to fix other problems we're running into
> ->with LOD morphing and pfBuffer::merge().
> ->
> ->Running the OPT.O32.IRISGL version under dbx gives.
> ->
> -> Process 1829 (perfly) stopped on signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation violation
(default) at [gl_n_viewport:71 ,0xf04b4f0]
> -> Source (of ../EXPRESS/_viewport.c) not available for Process
 1829
> -> (dbx) where
> -> > 0 gl_n_viewport(0x7fff25ec, 0x7fff25e8, 0x0, 0xa)
["../EXPRESS/_viewport.c":71, 0xf04b4f0]
> -> 1 gl_interpret() ["../object/interpret.s":67, 0xf097d30]
> ->
> ->Has anyone else run into this? Any ideas/suggestions?
>
> This smells like a problem that I had really thought had been fixed
> before 6.2.
> Please try running ipcs and removing and removing any ip structures
> that you see (will probably need to be root) and/or reboot.
> Let me know if this actually fixes it.
>
> Thanx,
> src.
>
> --
> -----{-----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++
> Sharon Rose Clay (Fischler) - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
> src++at++sgi.com (415) 933 - 1002 FAX: (415) 965 - 2658 MS 8U-590
> http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> -----{-----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from Sharon Clay

I had the same problem, too (I think I still have this problem). ipcrm didn't
solve this problem. Please let me know, if you fix the problem.

Regards
Daniela

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniela Rainer                       | email: rainer++at++rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Rechenzentrum Uni Stuttgart (RUS)    | Tel:   +49 (0) 711 685 5970	
Allmandring 30a, 70550 Stuttgart     | Fax:   +49 (0) 711 678 7672
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:26 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.