Re: trouble with perfly -x under 6.2 on Indigo 2 Extreme

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Sharon Clay (src++at++rose.asd.sgi.com)
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 20:49:28 -0700


+>---- On Aug 28, 5:57pm, Jon Christensen wrote:
> Subject: trouble with perfly -x under 6.2 on Indigo 2 Extreme
->After upgrading one of our Indigo 2's to 6.2 and upgrading
->Performer dev and eoe to 2.0.2 (patches 1392 and 1347), perfly -x
->is now crashing with some type of gl error. Our main application
->which runs fine under 2.0, dies after calling pfuGLXWinopen. We're
->trying to get to 2.0.2 to fix other problems we're running into
->with LOD morphing and pfBuffer::merge().
->
->Running the OPT.O32.IRISGL version under dbx gives.
->
-> Process 1829 (perfly) stopped on signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation violation (default) at [gl_n_viewport:71 ,0xf04b4f0]
-> Source (of ../EXPRESS/_viewport.c) not available for Process 1829
-> (dbx) where
-> > 0 gl_n_viewport(0x7fff25ec, 0x7fff25e8, 0x0, 0xa) ["../EXPRESS/_viewport.c":71, 0xf04b4f0]
-> 1 gl_interpret() ["../object/interpret.s":67, 0xf097d30]
->
->Has anyone else run into this? Any ideas/suggestions?

This smells like a problem that I had really thought had been fixed
before 6.2.
Please try running ipcs and removing and removing any ip structures
that you see (will probably need to be root) and/or reboot.
Let me know if this actually fixes it.

Thanx,
src.

-- 
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++
Sharon Rose Clay (Fischler) - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
src++at++sgi.com  (415) 933 - 1002  FAX: (415) 965 - 2658  MS 8U-590
http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:26 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.