Re: Performer 2.0 frustum problem

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Salvador Cabaruvias (sal++at++mbsgi1.mdc.com)
Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:10:54 -0700


On Aug 12, 4:17pm, Mark Negovan wrote:
> Subject: Re: Performer 2.0 frustum problem
> Hi Salvador,
>
> pfFrustAspect ( and others ) take a pfFrustrum * as the first arg.
> You are sending a pfChannel * which may cause unwanted side ( size ) affects.
> I have not tried to use the code but you may want to make sure you are
> sending the right types. This would not happen with C++ which is a more
> strongly typed language. Let me know if this helps.
>
I am modified the code to do just that... I am experimenting with those
calls to see if I can achieve the same effect as in Peformer 1.2.
>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Mark Negovan PHONE: 215 658 7000
> Systems Engineer FAX: 215 638 9285
> Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Inc. EMAIL: markn++at++trevose.sgi.com
> _________________________________________________________________________
>-- End of excerpt from Mark Negovan

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salvador Cabaruvias                       |     sal++at++sgidev.mdc.com             |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSSL                                      |     "Well I be done seen about every  
McDonnell Douglas                         |      thing when I see an elephant 
(310) 593-6719                            |      fly"  --Dumbo--
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:21 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.