Marcus Barnes (marcus++at++multigen.com)
Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:46:13 -0700
The subface approach is supported by the OpenFlight loader, but not the
"relative Priority" approach. There have been bugs in the support for
pfLayer/pfDecal in Performer 2.0, pfdBuilder and pfdLoadFile_flt. The
Performer 2.0.2 patch from SGI fixes such problems. The only decaling
mechanisim that always renders correctly is PFDECAL_BASE_STENCIL.
Unfortunately it is costly on RE2 (but not on iR). You can tell the
OpenFlight loader to use this mode:
% perfly -y flt,9,6 file.flt
or:
{
pfdConverterMode ( "flt", PFFLT_LAYER, PFDECAL_BASE_STENCIL );
pfdLoadFile ( "file.flt" );
}
> Do I have to triangulate everything before subfacing works, or is
> there something else I should be doing here? I don't want to cut the
> window out of the parapet, as that would increase my polygon count
> unacceptably for this realtime application.
Cutting out the subfaces can give good performance, especially on iR. Don't
rule it out without doing a benchmark first. MultiGen has tools, to
triangulate and cut out subfaces, that work pretty well.
Regards.
--
____ ___ ____ _ Marcus Barnes, Member Technical Staff
/ __ `__ \/ __ `( ) MultiGen Inc. 550 S. Winchester Blvd. STE 500
/ / / / / / /_/ / / San Jose CA 95128 WEB: http://www.multigen.com
/_/ /_/ /_/\__, /_/ PH:1-408-556-2654 FX:1-408-261-4102
/____/ EMAIL: marcus++at++multigen.com
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:21 PDT