Re: pfXformBox

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Sharon Clay (src++at++rose.asd.sgi.com)
Mon, 8 Jul 1996 22:20:41 -0700

+>---- On Jul 8, 10:16pm, Steve Baker wrote:
> Subject: pfXformBox
->
->I think that the function pfXformBox screws up
->when presented with an empty box to transform.
->
->Sometimes the box comes back *very* non-empty.
->
->It seems like the first line of pfXformBox ought
->to be something like:
->
-> if ( pfIsEmptyBox ( box ) )
-> return ;
->
->...since any transformation of an empty box ought
->to yield another empty box.
->
->Perhaps a friendly pfPerson would be so kind as
->to verify this particular pfBug - just in case it's
->my fault as usual :-(

Well, looks like maybe we took our traditional pfEnthusiasm for
just-say-no-to-if-tests just a bit too far. Empty boxes are fully
xformed.

Sharon-pfService-Clay :-)

-- 
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++
Sharon Rose Clay (Fischler) - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
src++at++sgi.com  (415) 933 - 1002  FAX: (415) 965 - 2658  MS 8U-590
http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++


=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:09 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.