Re: Performer 2.1 Installation

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Sharon Clay (src++at++rose.asd.sgi.com)
Wed, 26 Jun 1996 10:56:27 -0700

+>---- On Jun 26, 12:07pm, Steve Baker wrote:
> Subject: Re: Performer 2.1 Installation
->
->Gan Wang said:
->
->> I have just installed IRIX 6.2 and then tried to install Performer 2.1. It
->> gave me the following conflict report:
->>
->> Cannot replace performer_eoe.sw.common_performer (1232792133) with
->> performer_eoe.sw.common_performer (1234000053) because other products
->> depend on it.
->> 1a. Do not replace performer_eoe.sw.common_performer (1232792133)
->> 1b. Also remove performer_eoe.sw.igl_performer (1232792133)
->>
->> Apparently, performer_eoe from its 2.1 release conflicts with the one that
->> comes bundled with 6.2 release. I don't know how to resolve this and so
->> stopped the installation. Please help!
->
->This isn't an isolated incident - I had the same problem - I upgraded from
->6.2(beta) to 6.2(MR), then installed Performer and got exactly the same
->conflict - and I didn't know how to resolve it either.

It looks much worse than it is.

Performer2.1 was OpenGL only and did not include IRIS GL libraries.
However, Performer2.1 _does_ include both OpenGL and IRIS GL 2.0.1
libraries that exactly match what was shipped in IRIX 6.2. So,
you should be able to remove your old IRIS GL libs and install
the performer_compat subsystems in the 2.1 images and end up with all
the right DSOs and links.

src.

-- 
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++
Sharon Rose Clay (Fischler) - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
src++at++sgi.com  (415) 933 - 1002  FAX: (415) 965 - 2658  MS 8U-590
-----{-----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++   -----{----{---++at++




=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer.html
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:04 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.