Re: Performer 2.1 Installation

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Steve Baker (steve++at++mred.bgm.link.com)
Wed, 26 Jun 96 12:07:15 -0500

Gan Wang said:

> I have just installed IRIX 6.2 and then tried to install Performer 2.1. It
> gave me the following conflict report:
>
> Cannot replace performer_eoe.sw.common_performer (1232792133) with
> performer_eoe.sw.common_performer (1234000053) because other products
> depend on it.
> 1a. Do not replace performer_eoe.sw.common_performer (1232792133)
> 1b. Also remove performer_eoe.sw.igl_performer (1232792133)
>
> Apparently, performer_eoe from its 2.1 release conflicts with the one that
> comes bundled with 6.2 release. I don't know how to resolve this and so
> stopped the installation. Please help!

This isn't an isolated incident - I had the same problem - I upgraded from
6.2(beta) to 6.2(MR), then installed Performer and got exactly the same
conflict - and I didn't know how to resolve it either.

  Steve Baker 817-323-1361 (Vox-Lab)
  Hughes Training Inc. 817-695-8776 (Vox-Office/vMail)
  2200 Arlington Downs Road 817-695-4028 (Fax)
  Arlington, Texas. TX 76005-6171 steve++at++mred.bgm.link.com (eMail)

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer.html
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:04 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.