non orthogonal image generation

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

pere1++at++VIDEO3.cluny.ensam.fr
Wed, 26 Jun 1996 11:28:28 +0000

        Hello,

        I have two questions about Performer 2.0:

        first, could somebody tell me why, in the directory
        /usr/share/Performer/src/lib/libpfui, the source code is in C++ and not
in C like the others directories such as /usr/share/Performer/src/lib/libpfdb
or /usr/share/Performer/src/lib/libpfutil ? I have to compile this library
because I have modified /usr/src/Performer/src/lib/libpfutil/xformer.c in
Performer 1.2 (updateDrive and others procedures).

        Second, what is about the difference of frame rate between the same
application written in Performer 1.2 and in Performer 2.0 on the same computer?
Is it very significant? (x2 or 3) and are there less bugs?
I ask myself if I must port two years of difficult developpment in the new
version (about 2 or 3 months of adaptation )

        Thanks in advance

        Regards

                                                Christian.

-- 
login IRIX
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer.html
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:53:04 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.