SVR4 or BSD4.3 Signal Handling

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Bernard Leclerc (bleclerc++at++cae.ca)
Wed, 8 May 1996 17:36:57 -0400

I sent this e-mail a few weeks ago... but didn't received any comment.

So here it is again.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear pfUsers,

Our Performer-based application interfaces with another simulation process.
Upon termination, the simulation will send us a SIGTERM signal (signal 15). I'd
like to know which is best: use SVR4 signal handling functions or the BSD 4.3
version? Both seems to work but I'd like to know which is better to coexist
peacefully with Performer.

Thanks...

--
      ___/      |        ___/	Bernard Leclerc		e-mail: bleclerc++at++cae.ca
     /        / |       /	Systems Engineer	voice: +1 514 341 2000
    /        /  |      __/	CAE Electronics Ltd.		extension 2275
   /        /   |     /		8585 Cote De Liesse	fax:   +1 514 340 5496
  /        ____ |    /		P.O. Box 1800
_____/   _/    _|  _____/	Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada, H4L-4X4

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:52:53 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.