why member functions not virtual???

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Daniel Jia (xilin++at++cagiva.cambridge.com)
Thu, 2 May 1996 15:01:49 -0400

Next message: Jon Christensen: "typo in man pages"
Previous message: Stephen_Gifford++at++MAPS.CS.CMU.EDU: "Performer town question"

A basic question about Performer: Why aren't most member functions declared as
virtual so that new types can be easily derived from the existing ones?

Please reply via email. Thanks.

Next message: Jon Christensen: "typo in man pages"
Previous message: Stephen_Gifford++at++MAPS.CS.CMU.EDU: "Performer town question"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:52:52 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.