Re: pfGeoSet attributes and pfMemory question

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Marcus Barnes (marcus++at++multigen.com)
Fri, 22 Mar 1996 15:20:30 -0800

On Mar 21, 1:29pm, Nicolas Gauvin wrote:
> Subject: pfGeoSet attributes and pfMemory question

[munch]

> Now I would like to know the risks or consequences involved in setting
> the attributes of my pfGeoSet by giving as argument offsets addresses
> into this big chunk of data. In other workds I'm using a single
> pfMemory for all my pfGeoSet attribute lists instead of using separate ones
> for each attribute lists.

[munch]

>-- End of excerpt from Nicolas Gauvin

I doubt that a call to pf[Async]Delete(), that reaches your geoset, will be
able to delete the geoset attributes, since they are not pfMemory objects.
 This may be what you want. You'll be managing pfMemory blocks yourself.

Regards.

--
    __  ___      ____  _ ______          Marcus Barnes, Member Tech. Staff
   /  |/  /_  __/ / /_( ) ____/__  ____  MultiGen Inc, 550 S. Winchester
  / /|_/ / / / / / __/ / / __/ _ \/ __ \ Blvd. STE 500, San Jose CA 95128
 / /  / / /_/ / / / / / /_/ /  __/ / / / PH:1-408-556-2654 FX:1-408-261-4102
/_/  /_/\__,_/_/\_\/_/\____/\___/_/ /_/  EMAIL: marcus++at++multigen.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:52:34 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.