Re: Porting to 2.0 (Re: Performer 1.2 on Impact)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

ROY RUDDLE (saprar++at++thor.cf.ac.uk)
Fri, 22 Mar 1996 08:27:40 +0000 (GMT)

>
> Secondly, our apps are written in C++, not C. I saw a message the other day
> that the porting scripts don't handle C++ apps. Is this correct or did I
> misunderstand something? If I did read it correctly, any suggestions on
> efficiently porting C++ apps?
>
Gary,

I was the originator of the C++ question. I've been busy recently, so
I've yet to get really stuck in to find out what my port will entail.
However, my app is also in C++. PF 2.0 supports a C and a C++ API. Either
or both may be used simultaneously (according to which PF_XXX_API flags
are set). The port2.0 script helps with ports to the C API.

Unlike you, I have to go to 2.0 soon, because I've just got an Impact.
I'll let you know how I get on.

cheers

roy

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:52:34 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.