Re: Reply to Synchronizing HW pipes

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++bitch.reading.sgi.com)
Thu, 12 Oct 1995 12:34:53 +0100

I suppose this depends on your application, I had assumed you either had
a single out the window view with multiple pipes or an HMD application
where there is a pressing need to share the swapbuffers. With these
applications you certainly do want to share the PFCHAN_LOD but not to
solve the PFCHAN_SWAPBUFFERS reason.

On Oct 12, 11:15am, (Mario Veraart) wrote:
> Subject: Reply to Synchronizing HW pipes
> > Shouldn't you also be sharing the attribute PFCHAN_LOD among the three
> > channels on adjacent displays? Maybe sharing PFCHAN_SWAPBUFFERS and
> > PFCHAN_LOD together might solve the problem.
> > -anita
> PFCHAN_LOD Certainly not.
> If the two views are for two periscopes than you
> would change the LOD of the slave channel when you zoom out on the
> master channel.
>
> Mario
>
>-- End of excerpt from (Mario Veraart)

-- 
Angus Dorbie,
Silicon Graphics Ltd, UK
dorbie++at++reading.sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:57 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.