Re: Transparency

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

halliday++at++cs.sfu.ca
Wed, 20 Sep 1995 14:57:23 -0800 (PDT)

Next message: Bernard Leclerc: "Re: documentation pointers"
Previous message: Jim Helman: "Re: Transparency"
In reply to: trdecarlo++at++tasc.com: "Re: Transparency"
Next in thread: Jim Helman: "Re: Transparency"
Reply: Jim Helman: "Re: Transparency"
Reply: Angus Henderson: "Re: Transparency"

>
> > I don't think Performer does any pre-sorting of transparent parts,
> > and to get transparent parts to render correctly, they should
> > probably be rendered after all opaque parts and sorted to render
> > back to front.
>
> Performer 2.0 does depth sorting of transparent objects.

Can it do it by face, or just by object. For example
a taurus must be sorted by face to get proper blending.

>
> -jim
>
>
>

-- 
Sean Halliday halliday++at++cs.sfu.ca

Next message: Bernard Leclerc: "Re: documentation pointers"
Previous message: Jim Helman: "Re: Transparency"
In reply to: trdecarlo++at++tasc.com: "Re: Transparency"
Next in thread: Jim Helman: "Re: Transparency"
Reply: Jim Helman: "Re: Transparency"
Reply: Angus Henderson: "Re: Transparency"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:53 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.