Re: Performer vs other tool

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Roger Morris (rmorris++at++tswl.co.uk)
Tue, 25 Jul 95 09:28:14 BST


> From mtorres++at++arl.mil Fri Jul 21 16:26:03 1995
> From: mtorres++at++arl.mil (Torres Mario 678-3280 AMSRL-BE-M)
> Subject: Re: Performer vs other tool
> To: rmorris++at++tswl.co.uk (Roger Morris)
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 95 9:19:13 MDT
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL17]
> Content-Length: 916
>

>
> The Vega demo I saw looked very nice in terms of gui programming, however, at the
> time I got the impression that you would be limited to what vega has programmed.
> I was not aware that you still get full access to performer's toolset. Does this
> mean one can program and add as necessary to the vega toolset? Will it be
> upgradable with performer 2.0 and up? How about GL or OpenGl toolset? Can they
> be used with vega? If Vega is truly built from Performer I would think this
> would be possible.
>
> Thanks in advance for any info.
>
> Mario Torres
> STC ++at++ Army Research Lab.
>
Vega is sold at two levels. The Basic package communicates with the Performer
processes through a shared memory interface, so you can't make GL or Performer calls.
The Advanced package gives you direct access to the drawing process, so you can
call Performer and GL.
Performer 2 will be supported, OpenGL is in the works (I think), but only on SGI.

Roger Morris


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:42 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.