Laura Schmid (1LMS.DSKPO33B++at++DSKBGW1.ITG.ti.com)
Wed, 19 Jul 1995 19:08 CST
The reason (in the major simplified form) is that both VAPs
and Performer are "frameworks" and it is difficult to make one a
slave of the other. From our last discussions with
the VPI people, it is possible, but people who were
trying to do this had many problems getting their
applications to work. They may have addressed this problem
in VAPs 3.2, but we have not looked into it further.
Laura Schmid
Visualization & Simulation Technology
Texas Instruments, Inc.
email: laura-schmid++at++ti.com
-------------
Original Text
>From SSPSU91 ++at++ SMTP (SSPSU91) {guest++at++holodeck.asd.sgi.com}, on 7/19/95 6:28 PM:
To: laura-s ++at++ SMTP (laura-schmid) {laura-schmid++at++ti.com}
Has anyone used a product called VAPS from Virtual Prototypes Inc. located in
Canada? If so, can it be combined with or called from Performer. I
currently use both VAPS and Performer and see many uses for applications
which could call VAPS from the Performer draw process.
Stephanie Sroczyk, JJM Systems Inc.
SSPSU91++at++aol.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:41 PDT