Re: Fwd: Performer 2.0 - When?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Javier Castellar (javier++at++sixty)
Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:33:38 -0700


>>I had thought from various statements on the list that Performer 2.0 was
>>already in beta testing and that it would be released real soon now.
>>Now I've just heard a rumor that it won't even be going to beta testing for
>>two months. Is this totally off the wall, or what's happening here?
>
>Adding more fuel to the rumor-fire:
>
>My accomplice told me that Performer 3.0 (yes THREE) was due for release
around
>November of this year, and we should consider skipping the 2.0 release in
favor
>of 3.0. Of course I knew he was blowing smoke, but what if there's something
to
>this...

Performer 2.0 is the next release. Off course it will be 3.0, 4.0 ... but in
any case skipping a release is NOT a good idea since sometimes the people who
develope it use to have in mind the best path to avoid problems to his users in
future versions.

Fortunatelly version numbers doesn't mean only bug fixing.

-Javier

-- 
*************************************************************************
* Javier Castellar Arribas     * Email:              javier++at++asd.sgi.com *                 
*                              * Vmail:            		 3-1589 *            
* Member of Technical Staff    * Phone:                  (415)-390-1589 *
* Advanced Graphics	       * Fax:                    (415)-964-8671 *     
* Advanced Systems Division    * MailStop:                       8U-800 *
************************************************************************* 
* Silicon Graphics Inc.                                                 *
* 2011 N. Shoreline Boulevard,                                          *                        
* Mountain View, California 94043-1386, USA                             *
*************************************************************************

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:35 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.