Fernando D. Mato Mira (matomira++at++lig.di.epfl.ch)
Tue, 30 May 1995 19:50:12 +0200
> pfDCS? It seems that would be mainly a convenience, albeit perhaps a
> significant one for quaternion users.
What would be significant would be an implementation which does
not penalize quaternion users performance-wise.
Given that Performer is The Thing for SGI's aerospace users,
quaternions should be The Thing in Performer, probably.
And if someone is smart enough to be using Performer,
ditto for quaternions..
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:32 PDT