Marcus (giraffe.asd.sgi.com!sgi.sgi.com!uunet.uu.net!multigen!Marcus)
Wed, 10 May 1995 15:55:01 PST
Channel configuration in perfly is very misleading
with several sequences of redundant code and data
initialization.
I remember that it was the gui initialization code
that actually has final say on most things. Have
a look in gui.c ...
On this one though ... also look at InitSharedMem() and
InitPipe() in generic.c.
Regards,
Marcus Barnes, Member Technical Staff
MultiGen Inc., 1884 The Alameda, San Jose CA, 95126
PH: 1-408-261-4118 FX: 1-408-247-4329
EMAIL: multigen!marcus++at++uunet.UU.NET
--------------------------------------
Date: 5/10/95 11:21 AM
To: Marcus
From: Torsten Moeller
>From guest++at++holodeck.asd.sgi.com Wed May 10 13:48:52 1995
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQypdn16634; Wed, 10 May 1995 13:48:52 -0400
Received: from holodeck.asd.sgi.com by sgi.sgi.com via ESMTP
(950405.SGI.8.6.12/910110.SGI)
id KAA11854; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:26:16 -0700
Received: by holodeck.asd.sgi.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
for info-performer-dist id KAA02157; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:01:24 -0700
Received: from giraffe.asd.sgi.com by holodeck.asd.sgi.com via SMTP
(940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
for <info-performer++at++holodeck.asd.sgi.com> id KAA02154; Wed, 10 May 1995
10:01:24 -0700
Received: from sgi.sgi.com by giraffe.asd.sgi.com via SMTP
(931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
for info-performer++at++holodeck.asd.sgi.com id AA10103; Wed, 10 May 95 10:01:23
-0700
Received: from mane.cgrg.ohio-state.edu by sgi.sgi.com via ESMTP
(950405.SGI.8.6.12/910110.SGI)
for <info-performer++at++sgi.com> id KAA06390; Wed, 10 May 1995 10:01:20 -0700
Received: from stegosaur.cgrg.ohio-state.edu (tmoeller++at++cgrg.ohio-state.edu)
by mane.cgrg.ohio-state.edu (8.6.12/941010.52) with ESMTP id NAA26479 for
<info-performer++at++sgi.com>; Wed, 10 May 1995 13:01:13 -0400
Received: (from tmoeller) by stegosaur.cgrg.ohio-state.edu (8.6.10/941010)
id NAA10450 for info-performer++at++sgi.com; Wed, 10 May 1995 13:01:13 -0400
From: Torsten Moeller <tmoeller++at++cgrg.ohio-state.edu>
Message-Id: <199505101701.NAA10450++at++stegosaur.cgrg.ohio-state.edu>
Subject: Power ONYX with IRIX 6.0.1
To: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 13:01:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 590
I took perfly and only added one line to perfly.c:
WinSizeX = WinSizeY = 800;
in initSceneGraph (line 163).
Still, if I compile and run this modified perfly on
a Power ONYX with 4 R8000 processors under IRIX 6.0.1
it ignores the modified screensize.
Running the same code on another machine (Crimson, Indy)
everything is fine (i.e. I get a smaller window size).
Does anybody know, what is causing this behaviour?
Is Performer supposed to work on this kind of platforms
at all?
Thanks,
Torsten.
-- Research Assistant ACCAD tmoeller++at++cgrg.ohio-state.edu Ohio State University
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:51:29 PDT