Re: Conversion from MicroStation to Performer

Kim Michael Fairchild (fair++at++iss.nus.sg)
Wed, 14 Dec 1994 14:25:32 +0800

• Next message: Lance R. Marrou: "Re: performer and FORMS library"
• Previous message: Thom DeCarlo: "Re: Performer reads .iv. NOT!"
• Maybe in reply to: Thom DeCarlo: "Performer reads .iv. NOT!"
• Next in thread: Bjorn Eliasen: "Re: Conversion from MicroStation to Performer"

We wrote our own translator to our own format. Intergraph is VERY
complicated in the number of forms that it can produce (one of our
staff spent a year on the translator).

If you send us one of your models (one of the more complicated ones
for a test), we can see what the translation looks like.

thanks, Kim.

• Next message: Lance R. Marrou: "Re: performer and FORMS library"
• Previous message: Thom DeCarlo: "Re: Performer reads .iv. NOT!"
• Maybe in reply to: Thom DeCarlo: "Performer reads .iv. NOT!"
• Next in thread: Bjorn Eliasen: "Re: Conversion from MicroStation to Performer"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:50:44 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.