Fog on RE

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Marc SIMON Presales support (smarc++at++girl.paris.sgi.com)
Fri, 17 Jun 1994 15:14:06 -0600


Testing some customers codes using fog with perforemr 1.2 seems to show a
problem with the resolution of the fog table on the RE2.

When using FG_PIX_LIN or FG_PIX_EXP or FG_PIX_EXP2 with a far fog of 1000
m for instance and when drawing an object at 1100 m it is still visible.
I known that it is of course related to the range of Z value defining by
the near and far clipping plane and the lsetdepth value.But it works fine
on a Indigo2 Extreme...

You can try :

        - perfly enterprise.flt
                The model appear at ~ 2600 m from the viewer
        - fog on (Exponential or linear)
        - move the far fog to 2500 m .

        - You could see that the Mister Spoke ears are always visible...

Try to do the same on Extreme GFX ... It works fine.

Thanks to explain to me what's happend . Is it a bug ?? Is there a way to
avoid this ??

My customer is today waiting for an answer to decide to continue or to
stop with Performer .

Thanks to help me quickly.

-- 
-- Marc --		   Marc SIMON Presales support
			   ===========================
     
    ---------    //////  //     //    //////    ///////    ///////   -----------
               //       // /  / //  //     //  /      /  //               
  ---------    /////   //   /  //  /////////  ///////   //         -----------    
                  //  //      //  //     //  ///       //                 
---------   ///////  //      //  //     //  /  ///     ///////   ---------- 

Silicon Graphics France 21 Rue Albert Calmette Jouy-en-Josas 78350 FRANCE Tel (33) 1 34-88-80-00 email : smarc++at++paris.sgi.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ smarc++at++paris.sgi.com ****************************


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:50:20 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.