Infobyte S.R.L. (uunet!mclink.it!MC9258)
Wed, 23 Feb 94 12:25:30 CET
pfNode *node;
pfQueryHits(hits[0][0], PFQHIT_NODE, &node)
printf ( "%s", pfGetNodeName ( pfGetParent(node, 0) ) );
And enabling cleanTree, the callback with CB_CLEANNODE detects that
the nodes are effectively deleted by that function.
Thank you.
Three more questions:
1) How much performance is lost, disabling cleanTree?
2) I have noticed that, in my case, MultiGen objects are deleted,
but MultiGen groups are not. Is this a general rule, so I
can work with groups if I don't want an "object" deleted,
or I have to verify every time with CB_CLEANNODE?
3) In the README.SS file is written that with the CB_CLEANNODE
"the application can take the appropriate actions".
Which are these appropriate actions? Is there a way to know
which is the new address of the node?
Thank you again.
Massimo Cuomo - Infobyte - mc9258++at++mclink.it
=========================================
MAILBOX
Msg# 62445, 22/02/94 21:10 [4095]
Da: Paul++at++multigenuunet.uu.net
A : MC9258 Infobyte S.R.L.
-----------------------------------------
Oggetto: Re: FWD>Loadflt Callback And
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:50:11 PDT