Re: Problem with GL calls in Performer 1.2

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

John Rohlf (jrohlf++at++tubes)
Tue, 28 Dec 93 10:56:00 -0800

Next message: End of messages.
Other mail archives
Previous message: Brian Loss: "Re: Problem with GL calls in Performer 1.2"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Loss: "Problem with GL calls in Performer 1.2"

>I totally missed that. Thanks. However, in my program's initizaliation, I
>make the following calls:
>
> pfCullFace( PFCF_OFF );
> pfOverride( PFSTATE_CULLFACE, PF_ON );
>
>and they did not seem to solve the problem (I don't call pfOverride with
>PFSTATE_CULLFACE again). However, when I made the vertices of my polygon in
>counterclockwise order, it shows up. Am I using pfOverride incorrectly?
>

This is the correct usage of pfOverride and should definitely work.
Are you calling this in your pipe initialization function (pfInitPipe)?
How about a code fragment or a gldebug trace?

Previous message: Brian Loss: "Re: Problem with GL calls in Performer 1.2"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Loss: "Problem with GL calls in Performer 1.2"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:50:07 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.