Bounding boxes

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Ricardo Galli (gallir++at++anim.uib.es)
Tue, 9 Nov 93 18:49:38 GMT

Next message: Steve Elkins: "Re: which is the most recent version?"
Previous message: Ricardo Galli: "getting transformation matrix"
Next in thread: John Rohlf: "Re: Bounding boxes"
Maybe reply: John Rohlf: "Re: Bounding boxes"
Reply: Jim Helman: "Re: Bounding boxes"

Why when we try to get the bounding box from a DCS (making
an OR with the aproppiate value to overpass a bug in
performer) the b. box is much larger than the real one?

--Ricardo Galli
Universitat de les Illes Balears
Palma de Mallorca - SPAIN
Tel. +34 71 17 3201
FAX. +34 71 17 3003
e-mail. gallir++at++anim.uib.es
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
|The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to |
|choose from. |
| -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Next message: Steve Elkins: "Re: which is the most recent version?"
Previous message: Ricardo Galli: "getting transformation matrix"
Next in thread: John Rohlf: "Re: Bounding boxes"
Maybe reply: John Rohlf: "Re: Bounding boxes"
Reply: Jim Helman: "Re: Bounding boxes"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:50:05 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.