pfEnable

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Lance Marrou (marrou++at++indy.vsl.ist.ucf.edu)
Fri, 5 Nov 93 15:57:34 -0500

Would there be a preference in using the following:

{
    // disable fog
    pfDisable(PFEN_FOG);
    pfOverride(PFSTATE_ENFOG | PFSTATE_FOG, PF_ON);

    // enable fog
    pfOverride(PFSTATE_ENFOG | PFSTATE_FOG, PF_OFF);
    pfEnable(PFEN_FOG);
}

over:

{
    // disable fog
    pfESkyFog(esky, PFES_GENERAL, NULL);

    // enable fog
    pfESkyFog(esky, PFES_GENERAL, fog);
}

Or is it preferable to use both and why? Thanks in
advance for any help.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lance R. Marrou
   -- IST Visual Systems Lab
   -- E-mail: marrou++at++ist.ucf.edu

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:50:05 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.