Re: [info-performer] SGI Prism vs P42.8-GF4 : 0-1

From: Tiziano Diamanti (t.diamanti++at++cineca.it)
Date: 02/01/2005 08:55:37

• Next message: Stace Peterson: "Re: [info-performer] pfGeoArray::addAttrType incorrect documentio n - Doc. Needed"
• Next in thread: sinan kock: "Re: [info-performer] SGI Prism vs P42.8-GF4 : 0-1"

> It appears this one is a simple / easy mistake; the performer application
> was being run through the OMP (OpenGL Multipipe) layer to activate the
> compositor rather than just directly using the native support in Performer.
> For folks who do use OMP, be sure to run your performer apps (like perfly)
> using OMP's "-aware" option to bypass the indirection.

Hi,
I have a question about that: if we don't use OpenGL Multipipe, can the Performer
application be windowed? I mean can I open a wxWindow window with Performer
inside a GL Canvas in multipipe? The OpenGL context is created outside Performer
and then assigned to Performer once is ready. That works with OpenGL Multipipe, but it's very slow.
Otherwise, do I need to go full screen when using Performer multipipe natively?

Thanks

Tiziano Diamanti
Cineca
Italy

• Next message: Stace Peterson: "Re: [info-performer] pfGeoArray::addAttrType incorrect documentio n - Doc. Needed"
• Next in thread: sinan kock: "Re: [info-performer] SGI Prism vs P42.8-GF4 : 0-1"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 09:18:20 PST