From: Gordon Tomlinson (gordon++at++gordon-tomlinson.com)
Date: 09/03/2004 09:26:08
I think there's a pfExitWithoutExit() or similar you should call instead
note though that Performer is/was not really designed to be re-entrant in
the way that you want and you will probably have huge headaches in what your
trying to do.
I don't know of many if any that have been successful in shutting down and
Re-initialising with in an application or container
Best Regards
Gordon
___________________________________
Gordon Tomlinson
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-info-performer++at++performer.engr.sgi.com
[mailto:owner-info-performer++at++performer.engr.sgi.com] On Behalf Of
c3099023++at++tees.ac.uk
Sent: 01 September 2004 12:37
To: performer-feedback++at++sgi.com
Cc: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Subject: [info-performer] pfRenderMonkey and pfExit
Hey,
I have a proof of concept performer based viewer running inside RenderMonkey
(Foot icon and everything :) ). There are still some issues that I'm sorting
out with ATI. I'll make it available to all pf'ers out there, unless someone
already has one.
This leads me to the question of pfExit again. The man pages say pfExit
returns control to the application, when in fact it still exits the
application. This is with Performer 3.1.1 on Windows and Linux (demo
edition). The problem is that I'll most probably need to reinitialize
Performer many times.
Can you guys fix it for Performer 3.2? Please?
Cheers,
Goncalo
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
List Archives, Info, FAQ: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
Open Development Project: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 09:28:56 PDT