From: John Kelso (kelso++at++nist.gov)
Date: 01/20/2004 17:10:30
Hi again,
I just uninstalled and reinstalled Performer and still see the same bug,
Here's the sums of what I just installed, just to be sure I used the right
version:
06383 22993 performer_dev-3.1_gcc3-0.i386.rpm
35766 5937 performer_eoe-3.1_gcc3-0.i386.rpm
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
-John
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, John Kelso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might be using an older version of 3.1:
> > sum performer_dev-3.1_gcc3-0.i386.rpm
> 14095 22959
> > ls -l performer_dev-3.1_gcc3-0.i386.rpm
> -rw------- 1 kelso users 23509593 Dec 8 10:33 performer_dev-3.1_gcc3-0.i386.rpm
>
> I will download and reinstall the latest and see what happens.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -John
>
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Radomir Mech wrote:
>
> > This has been fixed in 3.1. It should be in any 3.1 alpha released
> > after 11/27/03. Could you try it please?
> >
> > Radomir
> >
> > Perry Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > > If I change either the X coordinate to ".21", OR, don't load
> > > > a pfMaterial into the builder...
> > >
> > > I am seeing similar weird behavior with materials and the loader. In my
> > > case, distinct materials are being optimized away (as reported by
> > > perfly). So I think the bug is actually in the optimizer.
> > >
> > > I reported this bug a few months back, so the developers should know
> > > about it. Perhaps they have some progress to report?
> > >
> > > Perry
> > >
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 20 2004 - 17:14:34 PST