[info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1

From: John Kelso (kelso++at++nist.gov)
Date: 12/08/2003 10:35:06

• Next message: faculaganymede: "[info-performer] glMatrixMode(GL_COLOR) and glLoadMatrixf(<matrix>)"
• Previous message: Alexander Lechner: "[info-performer] Texture Override per Texture Unit?"
• Next in thread: Allan Schaffer: "Re: [info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1"
• Reply: PEPPER Craig: "RE: [info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1"
• Reply: Dorosky, Christopher G: "RE: [info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1"

Hi,

About the same time that Performer 3.1 will be released we'll be setting
up several new Linux workstations to support our VR efforts- all will need
licensed copies of Performer. We'll also be upgrading our existing IRIX
and Linux workstations to 3.1.

This leads to a couple of questions:

1) Can we use our 3.0 Linux licenses for Performer 3.1, or will we need to
   get new licenses? Is there an upgrade price? I ask because I was
   surprised when my 3.0 license didn't work with the 3.1beta.

2) What flavor of Linux do you recommend? We're looking at Red Hat and
   SuSE, but will go with whatever SGI recommends as "best" to use with
   Performer. If you won't answer that, can you tell us what you use for
   your development?

Thanks,

-John

• Next message: faculaganymede: "[info-performer] glMatrixMode(GL_COLOR) and glLoadMatrixf(<matrix>)"
• Previous message: Alexander Lechner: "[info-performer] Texture Override per Texture Unit?"
• Next in thread: Allan Schaffer: "Re: [info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1"
• Reply: PEPPER Craig: "RE: [info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1"
• Reply: Dorosky, Christopher G: "RE: [info-performer] planning for Performer 3.1"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 08 2003 - 11:07:55 PST