From: Manne Baum (not.really++at++gmx.de)
Date: 09/03/2003 01:06:28
I suggest SGI could use doxygen compatible comments before each
Performer class and methode.
First a bit work but then really a help: automatically generated and
should be much closer to the code changes than "offline" documentations.
Alexandre Naaman wrote:
> Unfortunately, we don't have a Rational Rose model for Performer. That
> being said, I've used Rational Rose's Analyzer reverse engineering tools
> in the past with decent success.
>
> Another option is to spew out all the pfType's which exist within
> Performer. You can do this by subclassing pfType and adding a method to
> retreive the firstMemoryType static member and then just incrementing that
> pointer until it's NULL (because firstMemoryType points to a list of
> pfTypes.) Then you can (for each pfType ptr) get the parents and hence
> determine the entire class hierarchy. This won't cover everything (like
> some of the simpler classes like pfVec3 and other stuff that's in
> pfLinMath.h) but it's a good starting point, IMHO :)
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Alex.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 03 2003 - 01:12:29 PDT